Fuel and Combustion

Fuel and Combustion

Numerical investigation of the effects of cavity flameholder geometric parameters on the combustion performance of ramjet and scramjet engines

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Mechanical Engineering Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
2 Mechanical Engineering Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad. Iran
Abstract
In ramjet and scramjet engines, due to the very high velocity of the incoming flow into the combustion chamber, efficiency and effective fuel–air mixing face significant challenges. One efficient method to increase fuel residence time and create a suitable recirculation zone for stable combustion is the use of cavity flameholders. Despite the widespread application of this method, the effect of cavity geometry on combustion performance in both ramjet and scramjet engines, especially under heated conditions, still requires comprehensive investigation. The aim of this study is to numerically investigate the effect of cavity geometric parameters—including height, length, and ramp angle—on combustion efficiency in both ramjet and scramjet engines. For this purpose, simulations were performed using ANSYS Fluent with the SST k–ω turbulence model in a compressible, hydrogen-fueled combustion configuration. The results indicate that increasing the cavity height in both engines improves combustion efficiency. Reducing the cavity length can also enhance combustion efficiency in both engines. These findings can serve as a basis for optimizing flameholder geometry in future supersonic engines.

Highlights

High-speed air-breathing propulsion systems, particularly ramjet and scramjet engines, represent key technologies for supersonic and hypersonic flight. Unlike conventional turbojet engines, these systems operate without rotating compressors or turbines and rely entirely on the dynamic compression of incoming air. In ramjet engines, combustion occurs at subsonic speeds inside the combustor, whereas in scramjet engines (Supersonic Combustion Ramjet), combustion takes place under supersonic flow conditions. Although this structural simplicity allows operation at extremely high Mach numbers, it introduces significant challenges in fuel–air mixing, flame stabilization, and combustion efficiency.

At high flow velocities, especially in scramjet configurations, the residence time of fuel inside the combustion chamber becomes extremely short. As a result, achieving stable combustion and complete fuel consumption is difficult. Among the various flame stabilization techniques, cavity-based flameholders have been widely adopted due to their ability to create recirculation zones that trap hot combustion products, increase fuel residence time, and enhance turbulent mixing. Previous investigations, including the experimental studies of Gruber and the comprehensive review by Ben-Yakar, demonstrated the effectiveness of cavity flameholders in stabilizing supersonic flames. More recent hydrogen-fueled investigations published in the International Journal of Hydrogen Energy have emphasized the sensitivity of combustion performance to cavity geometry.

Despite extensive research, most studies have focused on either ramjet or scramjet engines individually, and systematic comparisons under identical modeling frameworks remain limited. Furthermore, the combined effects of cavity height, length, and aft-wall angle under hot hydrogen combustion conditions have not been comprehensively evaluated. Therefore, the present study aims to numerically investigate the influence of these geometric parameters on combustion efficiency in both ramjet and scramjet engines using a unified computational approach.

Methodology

The computational domain consists of an inlet section, a combustor equipped with a wall-mounted cavity flameholder, and a downstream outlet region. The baseline cavity geometry includes a height of 9.8 mm, a length of 19 mm, and an aft-wall angle of 30°. Parametric variations are introduced by considering cavity heights of 6 mm and 12 mm, cavity lengths of 13 mm and 25 mm, and aft-wall angles of 15° and 45°. Hydrogen is selected as the fuel due to its high reactivity and suitability for high-speed propulsion systems.

Two operating conditions are considered: a ramjet configuration with subsonic combustor flow and a scramjet configuration with a Mach 2.5 supersonic inlet condition. All simulations are performed using ANSYS Fluent under compressible reacting flow assumptions. The governing equations include continuity, compressible Navier–Stokes, energy, and species transport equations.

Turbulence is modeled using the SST k–ω model, which is well suited for predicting boundary layer separation, shear layer development, and shock–boundary layer interactions in high-speed flows. Combustion is simulated using the Finite-Rate/Eddy-Dissipation model to account for both chemical kinetics and turbulence–chemistry interaction effects. Appropriate pressure-based boundary conditions are applied at the inlets and outlet depending on the engine configuration, while all walls are treated as no-slip and adiabatic.

Grid independence is verified using three mesh densities, and dimensionless static pressure distributions are compared to ensure numerical accuracy. Second-order discretization schemes and a coupled pressure–velocity solver are employed to enhance stability and accuracy. Combustion efficiency is defined based on hydrogen mass consumption between inlet and outlet, providing a direct quantitative measure of fuel utilization.

Discussion and Results

The numerical results demonstrate that cavity geometry significantly affects flow structure, recirculation strength, temperature distribution, and combustion efficiency in both engines. Increasing cavity height enhances combustion efficiency in both ramjet and scramjet configurations. A larger cavity height produces a stronger recirculation zone, increases residence time, and promotes improved fuel–air mixing. The effect is more pronounced in the ramjet engine due to longer subsonic residence time, which allows more complete heat release and reaction progression. In the scramjet configuration, although combustion efficiency increases with cavity height, the improvement is less significant because supersonic flow rapidly convects thermal energy toward the outlet.

Reducing cavity length generally leads to a moderate improvement in combustion efficiency. Longer cavities may cause partial fuel accumulation and spillage, weakening effective mixing within the shear layer above the cavity. Shorter cavities concentrate the recirculation region and strengthen mixing interactions. However, sensitivity to cavity length is lower compared to cavity height.

The aft-wall angle influences vortex structure, shear layer behavior, and flame anchoring location. Smaller angles tend to shift the recirculation zone downstream and may reduce mixing effectiveness, while larger angles intensify shear layer entrainment and improve flame stabilization. Nevertheless, excessively steep angles may introduce aerodynamic penalties, indicating that optimal geometric design requires balanced parameter selection.

A comparative analysis shows that the ramjet configuration is more sensitive to geometric modifications than the scramjet configuration. Because combustion occurs under subsonic conditions in the ramjet, changes in residence time and recirculation strength directly influence reaction completeness. In contrast, the scramjet operates under supersonic flow where limited residence time reduces the overall impact of geometric variations, although similar trends are observed.

Conclusion

A comprehensive numerical investigation was conducted to evaluate the effects of cavity flameholder geometric parameters on hydrogen combustion performance in both ramjet and scramjet engines. The results indicate that increasing cavity height significantly improves combustion efficiency by strengthening recirculation and increasing fuel residence time. Shorter cavity lengths provide moderate improvements by reducing fuel spillage and concentrating mixing regions. The aft-wall angle strongly affects vortex formation and flame stabilization, and appropriate optimization enhances combustion performance.

Overall, the ramjet engine exhibits greater sensitivity to geometric variations due to longer residence time and subsonic combustion conditions, whereas the scramjet shows similar but less pronounced trends under supersonic flow. The findings provide practical design guidelines for optimizing cavity flameholder geometry in

Keywords
Subjects

در این پژوهش، اثر پارامترهای هندسی حفره شعله‌نگهدار شامل ارتفاع، طول و زاویه دیواره انتهایی آن بر بازده احتراق در محفظه احتراق موتورهای رم‌جت و اسکرَم‌جت به صورت عددی بررسی شد. شبیه‌سازی‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار ANSYS Fluent، مدل آشفتگی SST k–ω و مدل احتراق Finite-Rate/Eddy-Dissipation در شرایط گرم و با سوخت هیدروژن انجام گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که افزایش ارتفاع حفره در هر دو موتور باعث تقویت ناحیه بازچرخش و افزایش زمان ماند سوخت شده و در نهایت منجر به بهبود بازده احتراق می‌شود. این اثر در موتور رم‌جت محسوس‌تر است، زیرا زمان ماند جریان فروصوتی بیش‌تر بوده و فرصت اختلاط و واکنش کامل‌تر فراهم می‌شود. همچنین کاهش طول حفره موجب تمرکز بهتر ناحیه احتراق و کاهش سرریز سوخت از حفره شده و بازده احتراق را در هر دو موتور افزایش داده است، هرچند حساسیت این پارامتر نسبت به ارتفاع کمتر بوده است. از سوی دیگر، تغییر زاویه دیواره انتهایی حفره باعث جابه‌جایی ساختار گردابه‌ها و محل تمرکز شعله شده و در برخی شرایط می‌تواند منجر به کاهش بازده احتراق به دلیل سرریز سوخت شود. بنابراین زاویه بهینه باید به گونه‌ای انتخاب شود که ضمن تقویت بازچرخش، از خروج زودهنگام سوخت جلوگیری کند. در مجموع، یافته‌های این پژوهش می‌تواند به عنوان مبنایی برای طراحی و بهینه‌سازی هندسه شعله‌نگهدارها در موتورهای پرسرعت آینده مورد استفاده قرار گیرد. در پایان، لازم به ذکر است که در این مطالعه محدودیت‌هایی چون دوبعدی بودن شبیه‌سازی‌ها و بررسی نشدن اثر آرایش‌های چندحفره‌ای وجود دارد. پیشنهاد می‌شود در مطالعات آینده اثر تعداد حفره‌ها، تزریق چندنقطه‌ای و استفاده از مدل‌های سینتیکی دقیق‌تر برای تحلیل کامل‌تر احتراق فراصوتی مورد توجه قرار گیرد.

A. Ben-Yakar and R. K. Hanson, "Cavity flame-holders for ignition and flame stabilization in scramjets: an overview," J. Propuls. Power, vol. 17, pp. 869–877, 2001.
[2] K. M. Kim, S. W. Baek, and C. Y. Han, "Numerical study on supersonic combustion with cavity-based fuel injection," Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 47, pp. 271–286, 2004.
[3] M. R. Gruber, R. A. Baurle, T. Mathur, and K.-Y. Hsu, "Fundamental studies of cavity-based flameholder concepts for supersonic combustors," J. Propuls. Power, vol. 17, pp. 146–153, 2001.
[4] W. Huang, M. Pourkashanian, L. Ma, D. B. Ingham, S. Luo, and Z. Wang, "Effect of geometric parameters on the drag of the cavity flameholder based on the variance analysis method," Aerosp. Sci. Technol., vol. 21, pp. 24–30, 2012.
[5] Z. Cai, M. Sun, Z. Wang, and X.-S. Bai, "Effect of cavity geometry on fuel transport and mixing processes in a scramjet combustor," Aerosp. Sci. Technol., vol. 80, pp. 309–314, 2018.
[6] R. Moradi, A. Mahyari, M. B. Gerdroodbary, A. Abdollahi, and Y. Amini, "Shape effect of cavity flameholder on mixing zone of hydrogen jet at supersonic flow," Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 43, pp. 16364–16372, 2018.
[7] G. Choubey, M. Solanki, T. Bhatt, G. Kshitij, D. Yuvarajan, and W. Huang, "Numerical investigation on a typical scramjet combustor using cavity floor H2 fuel injection strategy," Acta Astronaut., vol. 202, pp. 373–385, 2023.
[8] Y. Wang, "Large-eddy simulation of flow separation in Savonius turbines," Renew. Energy, 2024. (in press, as per original citation)
[9] M. B. Gerdroodbary, Scramjets: fuel mixing and injection systems. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2020. (in Persian)
[10] S.-H. Lee, "Characteristics of dual transverse injection in scramjet combustor, part 1: Mixing," J. Propuls. Power, vol. 22, pp. 1012–1019, 2006.
[11] H. Wang, Z. Wang, M. Sun, and N. Qin, "Simulations of combustion with normal and angled hydrogen injection in a cavity-based supersonic combustor," Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G J. Aerosp. Eng., vol. 228, pp. 530–541, 2014.
[12] F. Gong, Y. Huang, and X. Huang, "Size effect on the flame base locations after V-gutters for premixed flames," Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 82, pp. 406–418, 2015.
[13] W. Xi, P. Liu, Q. Shao, W. Guo, and J. Liu, "Parametric study of flow and combustion characteristic in a cavitied scramjet with multi-position injection," Fire, vol. 7, p. 176, 2024.
[14] J. Dai, L. Chen, and F. Kong, "Research on the mixing characteristics of a cavity based supersonic combustion chamber coupled with secondary recirculation jets," Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 92, pp. 516–526, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.10.303.
[15] J. C. Small, L. Zhang, B. G. Crawford, and V. Viti, "Flow and Flame Stabilization in Scramjet Engine Combustor with Two Opposing Cavity Flameholders," Aerospace, vol. 12, p. 723, 2025.