Influence of Inlet Temperature and Pressure in Transcritical and Supercritical Laminar Counter-Flow Flame of Liquid Oxygen/ Gaseous Methane

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Sharif university of technology

2 Aerospace Department, Sharif University of Technology

Abstract

In the present paper, a laminar counter-flow flame has been numerically investigated under the transcritical and supercritical conditions. The Cantera open source code has been used to calculate the flow field and the kinetic combustion solution. Furthermore, the energy equation, the thermodynamics and the transport properties have been modified for real gas solution. The thermodynamics properties, including density, enthalpy, and specific heat at constant pressure, are evaluated based on fundamental thermodynamics theories and the modified SRK equation of state (EOS). Transport properties, including thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity, are estimated using Chung method. It can be seen that the pseudo-boiling phenomenon has been appeared in transcritical condition with real gas equations. The ideal gas solution is unable to capture this phenomenon. In the mixture fraction field, there is no major difference between the real gas and the ideal gas, which is important for solving the turbulent reacting flow by the flamelet models. However In the physical field, the difference between the real gas condition and the ideal gas is significant in terms of the position and dimensions of the flame for the transcritical state. For supercritical conditions in the physical field similar to mixture fraction field, there is no significant difference in the flame situation.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. J. Foster and R. S. Miller,"Fundamentals of high pressure combustion, in: M. Lackner (Ed.), High Pressure Processes In Chemical Engineering,” Process Eng Engineering, Wien, 2010.
  2. G. M. Bianchi, P. Pelloni, F. E. Corcione, L. Allocca and F. Luppino, “Modeling atomization of high-pressure diesel sprays,” J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power, 123, 2001, pp.419–427
  3. W. Mayer and H. Tamura,”Propellant injection in a liquid oxygen/gaseous hydrogen rocket engine,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, 12, 1996, pp. 1137–1147.
  4. C. K. Law, “Combustion physics,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2006.
  5. F. A. Williams, Combustion theory, 2nd ed., The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, 1985.
  6. L. Figura and A. Gomez, “Laminar counterflow steady diffusion flames under high pressure (P 6 3 MPa) conditions,” Combustion and Flame, 159, 2012, pp.142–150
  7. J. Juanos, , N. Zong, V. Yang, L. Pons, N. Darabiha and S. Candel, “Counterflow diffusion flames of general fluids: oxygen/hydrogen mixtures,” Combustion and Flame, 154, 2008, pp.319–330.
  8. V. Ricchiuti, R. E. Padilla, S. Karnani and D. Dunn-Rankin, “Cantera simulations of water-laden methane/air nonpremixed counterflow flames,” 8th US National Combustion Meeting, Utah, 2013.
  9. U. Niemann, K. Seshadri and F.A. Williams, “Methane, ethane, and ethylene laminar counterflow diffusion flames at elevated pressures: experimental and computational investigations up to 2.0 MPa,” Combustion and Flame, 161, 2014, pp. 138-146.
  10. G. Ribert, N. Zong, V. Yang, L. Pons, N. Darabiha and S. Candel, “Counterflow diffusion flames of general fluids: oxygen/hydrogen mixtures,” Combustion and Flame, 154, 2008, pp.319–330.
  11. B. A. Williams, “Sensitivity of calculated extinction strain rate to molecular transport formulation in nonpremixed counterflow flames,” Combustion and Flame, 124, 2001, pp. 330–333.
  12. X. Wang, H. Huo and V. Yang, “Counterflow diffusion flames of oxygen and n-alkane hydrocarbons (CH 4 −C 16 H 34) at subcritical and supercritical conditions,” Combustion Science and Technology, 187, 2015, pp. 60-82.
  13. G. Lacaze and J. Oefelein, "A non-premixed combustion model based on flame structure analysis," Combustion and Flame, 159, 2012, pp. 2087–2103.
  14. D. T. Banuti, “Crossing the widom-line-supercritical pseduo-boiling,” Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 98, 2015, pp.12-16.
  15. D. T. Banuti and K. Hannemann, “Effect of injector wall heat flux on cryogenic injection,” AIAA Paper 2010-7139, 2010.
  16. D. T. Banuti, V. Hannemann, K. Hannemann, and B. Weigand, “An effcient multi-fluid-mixing model for real gas reacting flows in liquid propellant rocket engines,” Combustion and Flame, 168, 2016, pp.98-112.
  17. R. J. Kee, J. A. Miller and G. H. Evans, “A computational model of the structure and extinction of strained, opposed flow, premixed methane-air flames,” Proceeding of International Symposium of Combustion Institute, 1988, pp.1479–1494.
  18. H. Huo, X. Wang and V. Yang, “A general study of counterflow diffusion flames at subcritical and supercritical conditions: oxygen/hydrogen mixtures,” Combustion and Flame, 161, 2014, pp. 3040-3050.
  19. Cantera Developers (2012). Cantera: Chemical kinetics, Thermodynamics, Transport properties. Available: http://cantera.github.com/docs/sphinx/html/index.html, Accessed 24/03/2018
  20. Soave, “Equation constants from a modified Redlich-Kwong equation of state,” Chemical Engineering Science, 27, 1972, pp. 1197-1203.
  21. P. E. Lapenna, P. P. Ciottoli and F. Creta, “The Effect of Fuel Composition on the Non-premixed Flame Structure of LNG/LOx Mixtures at Supercritical Pressure,” AIAA-Paper 2016-0690.
  22. T, Kim, Y. Kim and S-K. Kim, “Effects of Pressure and Inlet Temperature on Coaxial Gaesous Methane/Liquid Oxygen Turbulent Jet Flame under Transcritical Condtions,” Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 81, 2013, pp. 164-174.
  23. R. Reid, J. Prausnitz and B. Poling, The Properties of Gases and Liquids, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1987.
  24. E. W. Lemmone, M. l. Huber and M. O. McLinden, “NIST standard reference database 23: reference fluid thermodynamic and transport properties-REFPROP, verison 9.1”, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg. 2013.
  25. T. H. Chung, M. Ajlan, L. L. Lee, and K. E. Starling, "Generalized multiparameter correlation for nonpolar and polar fluid transport properties," Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 27, 1988, pp. 671-679.

 

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 28 July 2018
  • Revise Date: 26 November 2018
  • Accept Date: 01 December 2018

Share

How to cite

Statistics