Fuel and Combustion

Fuel and Combustion

Application and Comparison of Synthetic Zeolite (ZSM-5) and Natural Zeolite (Mordenite) Catalysts in Biodiesel Production from Neem seed-derived oil by Electrochemical Method

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
School of Chemistry, University of Tehran
10.22034/jfnc.2026.541423.1436
Abstract
In this study, the performance of two catalysts, ZSM-5 zeolite and sulfated mordenite, for the production of biodiesel from neem oil using an electrochemical method has been investigated. The structure and performance of the catalysts have been characterized by various methods such as FT-IR, XRD, EDX, BET and NH3-TPD, and the quality of the final product has been evaluated based on ASTM standards. The aim of this research is to develop an economical and efficient process for biodiesel production that benefits from the advantages of electrochemical method and heterogeneous catalysts and moves towards renewable energies.
Most of the materials used in the experiment, including oleic acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid, methanol (99%), tetrahydrofuran (THF), sodium chloride, sulfuric acid (98%), potassium hydroxide, normal hexane and solid phenolphthalein were purchased from Merck, Germany. Zeolite ZSM-5 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. Mordenite was purchased from Zeolite International Company in Semnan and neem seeds were purchased from Bandar Abbas.
All experiments were performed in a glass jacketed reactor. The electrodes used for this study were two graphite electrodes of the same type and size (1 cm × cm2) and with an internal distance of 1 cm.
In this study, chromatographic analysis (GC) was used to qualitatively and quantitatively measure biodiesel production. The model of the device used was 7890A and the capillary columns used in the Rtx-5 MS and HP-5 device. Also, quantitative FT-IR analysis was used to identify the biodiesel produced, with the FT/IR- Bruker/tensor 27 device model.
Also, in this study, analyses were used to identify the properties of the catalyst. To identify the crystalline phase of the catalyst, functional groups, specific surface area, acidity, morphology and elemental analysis, XRD (with Philips Xpert X-ray diffractometer device model), FT-IR (with FT-IR/ Bruker/tensor 27 device model), BET (with Microtrac BEL Corp device model), NH3-TPD (with Chemisorption Analyzer, NanoSORD (made by Sensiran Co., Iran)), EDX-Mapping (with FESEM device model, ZEISS, Germany, Sigma VP), were used, respectively.
To investigate the extracted fatty acids, GC analysis with mass detector was used. Through GC-MS analysis, it was determined that the most abundant fatty acids in the extracted oil are oleic acid, palmitic acid, and stearic acid. Their respective amounts are reported in Table 1. Eicosanoic acid is another fatty acid present in the extracted oil, which was less than 0.1%.
In this study, the production of biodiesel from FFAs present in synthetic neem oil was investigated and compared by electrochemical method in the presence of two types of zeolite catalysts including Nano-zeolite ZSM-5 and Nano-sulfated mordenite.
The reaction mixture consisted of synthetic neem oil (initial feed), methanol, THF (as co-solvent), sodium chloride (as electrolyte), distilled water and catalyst. All reactions were carried out at ambient temperature. Each of the parameters including molar ratio of methanol to oil at three levels of 10, 20 and 30, voltage applied to the system at levels of 10, 25 and 40 V, reaction time in the range of 1, 2 and 3 hours and catalyst amount of 2, 4 and 6 wt% were tested and finally their optimal amount was obtained and reported. Also, the molar ratio of THF/Oil (cosolvent to oil) was 10:1, the amount of NaCl to oil was 1% by weight, and the amount of distilled water based on the total weight of the solution was 2% by weight. The water in the electrochemical system is hydrolyzed around the anode and cathode electrodes, producing hydrogen ions (reaction 2) and hydroxide ions, respectively. The hydrogen ion produced can act as an acid catalyst for the reaction, the mechanism of which will be examined in the catalysts section. The hydroxide ion produced by the reaction with methanol produces methoxide ion, which is a very strong nucleophile and can act as a base catalyst. Therefore, by hydrolyzing water and simultaneously producing hydroxide and hydrogen ions in the system, both esterification and transesterification processes are carried out simultaneously, so if the feed contains a high amount of acid, it does not cause a problem in the reaction path. Another advantage of electrochemical reactions is that they can be carried out at ambient temperature, saving high energy consumption and being relatively inexpensive [19]. The mechanism of action of both catalysts included the role of Lewis and Brønsted acidic sites in activating the carbonyl group of FFAs and facilitating nucleophilic attack. However, the sulfated mordenite catalyst, due to the presence of sulfate groups with high electronegativity, stronger acidity, and increased surface hydrophobicity, led to more effective adsorption of FFAs and faster removal of produced water molecules, and showed higher efficiency than ZSM-5 zeolite in converting free fatty acids to fatty acid methyl ester (biodiesel). The results of this study show that the choice of zeolite type and its surface modification have a significant impact on the efficiency and speed of the biodiesel production process in electrochemical systems.
 
Conclusion
Biodiesel has the potential to replace fossil fuels. In this study, the esterification process of synthetic neem seed oil was investigated using electrochemical method in the presence of zeolite catalysts. Zeolites have high potential for activity in this type of processes due to the presence of Lewis and Brønsted acidic sites inside and on the surface of their structure.
The findings of this study showed that the sulfuric acid-modified mordenite catalyst (0.5 M sulfated mordenite) performed much better than the ZSM-5 zeolite catalyst in the esterification process of neem seed oil. Analysis of the catalyst characterization results, especially the EDX-Mapping test, revealed the reason for this superiority. The silicon to aluminum (Si/Al) ratio is known as a key indicator in improving the efficiency of zeolite catalysts; increasing this ratio increases the hydrophobicity of the catalyst surface and reduces the possibility of reaction reversal or side reactions. The results showed that the Si/Al ratio for ZSM-5 is 2.22 and for 0.5 M sulfated mordenite is 25.07. In addition, the sulfation process causes the attachment of sulfate functional groups to the catalyst surface. Due to their strong electron-withdrawing properties, these groups significantly strengthen Lewis and Brønsted acids, thereby improving the reaction mechanism.
The effect of operating parameters was investigated using the “one-factor-at-time” method, which showed that the optimal conditions were a voltage of 10 V, a reaction time of 1 h, a molar ratio of methanol to oil of 10:1, and a catalyst amount of 6 wt%. Under these conditions, the biodiesel production efficiency was 85% in the presence of sulfated mordenite and 80% in the presence of ZSM-5. These results indicate that the modification of natural mordenite catalyst by sulfation can be an effective solution for improving the efficiency and performance of biodiesel production processes.

Highlights

In this study, the performance of two catalysts, synthetic zeolite ZSM-5 and natural sulfated mordenite zeolite, was compared in the biodiesel production process from synthetic neem seed oil. This process was investigated using the esterification method through electrochemical methods. Synthetic zeolite ZSM-5 catalyst was used as a standard and unmodified sample, while natural mordenite zeolite was modified by the sulfation process to improve catalytic properties and increase reaction efficiency. The effect of various operating parameters on the reaction efficiency was investigated and it is found that sulfated mordenite catalyst with hydrophobic properties significantly increases the conversion efficiency. The results show that both catalysts have good recovery and reuse capabilities and the physicochemical properties of the biodiesel produced are in accordance with ASTM standards. This study is considered an effective step in the use of modified natural catalysts in sustainable biodiesel production and presents the advantages and limitations of both types of catalysts under similar conditions.

Keywords

Subjects


[1]    A. Ramos, E. Monteiro, and A. Rouboa, "Biomass pre-treatment techniques for the production of biofuels using thermal conversion methods – A review," Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 270, p. 116271, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116271.
[2]    F. Martins, C. Felgueiras, M. Smitkova, and N. Caetano, "Analysis of fossil fuel energy consumption and environmental impacts in European countries," Energies, vol. 12, no. 6, p. 964, 2019.
[3]    M. D. B. Watanabe, F. Cherubini, A. Tisserant, and O. Cavalett, "Drop-in and hydrogen-based biofuels for maritime transport: Country-based assessment of climate change impacts in Europe up to 2050," Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 273, p. 116403. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116403.
[4]    H. Lin, X. Chen, Y. Chu, J. Fu, and L. Yang, "Dilemma and strategies for production of diesel-like hydrocarbons by deoxygenation of biomass-derived fatty acids," Green Energy & Environment, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1153-1186, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.gee.2024.08.005.
[5]    V. K. Mishra and R. Goswami, "A review of production, properties and advantages of biodiesel," Biofuels, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 273-289, 2018.
[6]    M. Zoghi and M. Saidi, "Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil by application of perovskite structure catalyst: Experimental and theoretical evaluation of strontium stannate catalyst activity," Fuel, vol. 357, p. 129713. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129713.
[7]    M. Safaripour, M. Saidi, and A. Jahangiri, "Application of samarium doped lanthanum nickel oxide perovskite nanocatalyst for biodiesel production," Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 296, p. 117667, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117667.
[8]    M. Zabeti, W. M. A. W. Daud, and M. K. Aroua, "Activity of solid catalysts for biodiesel production: a review," Fuel processing technology, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 770-777, 2009.
[9]    E. G. Fawaz, D. A. Salam, L. Pinard, and T. J. Daou, "Study on the catalytic performance of different crystal morphologies of HZSM-5 zeolites for the production of biodiesel: a strategy to increase catalyst effectiveness," Catalysis Science & Technology, 10.1039/C9CY01427F vol. 9, no. 19, pp. 5456-5471, 2019. doi: 10.1039/C9CY01427F.
[10]  S. Mohebbi, M. Rostamizadeh, and D. Kahforoushan, "Efficient sulfated high silica ZSM-5 nanocatalyst for esterification of oleic acid with methanol," Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 294, p. 109845, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.109845.
[11]  M. Rostamizadeh, F. Yaripour, and H. Hazrati, "Ni-doped high silica HZSM-5 zeolite (Si/Al= 200) nanocatalyst for the selective production of olefins from methanol," Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, vol. 132, pp. 1-10, 2018.
[12]  M. Rostamizadeh and F. Yaripour, "Dealumination of high silica H-ZSM-5 as long-lived nanocatalyst for methanol to olefin conversion," Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, vol. 71, pp. 454-463, 2017.
[13]  A. A. Kiss, A. C. Dimian, and G. Rothenberg, "Solid acid catalysts for biodiesel Production–‐Towards sustainable energy," Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis, vol. 348, no. 1‐2, pp. 75-81, 2006.
[14]  D. Dastan, M. Pezhmanmehr, N. Askari, S. N. Ebrahimi, and J. Hadian, "Essential oil compositions of the leaves of Azadirachta indica A. Juss from Iran," Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 357-361, 2010.
[15]  M. H. Ali, M. Mashud, M. R. Rubel, and R. H. Ahmad, "Biodiesel from Neem oil as an alternative fuel for Diesel engine," Procedia Engineering, vol. 56, pp. 625-630, 2013.
[16]  M. A. Asl, K. Tahvildari, and T. Bigdeli, "Eco-friendly synthesis of biodiesel from WCO by using electrolysis technique with graphite electrodes," Fuel, vol. 270, p. 117582, 2020.
[17]  M. Helmi, K. Tahvildari, A. Hemmati, and A. Safekordi, "Phosphomolybdic acid/graphene oxide as novel green catalyst using for biodiesel production from waste cooking oil via electrolysis method: Optimization using with response surface methodology (RSM)," Fuel, vol. 287, p. 119528, 2021.
[18]  W. P. Wicaksono, S. A. Jati, I. Yanti, and P. K. Jiwanti, "Co-solvent free electrochemical synthesis of biodiesel using graphite electrode and waste concrete heterogeneous catalyst: optimization of biodiesel yield," Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering & Catalysis, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 179-187, 2021.
[19]  G. Guan and K. Kusakabe, "Synthesis of biodiesel fuel using an electrolysis method," Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 159-163. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.06.005.
[20]  N. R. Sturt, S. S. Vieira, and F. C. Moura, "Catalytic activity of sulfated niobium oxide for oleic acid esterification," Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 102866, 2019.
[21]  S. S. Nada, S. I. Hawash, M. A. Zahran, and E. M. Ahmed, "Preparation of Poly (AAc/AAm)/NaOH Hydrogel as a Catalyst for Electrolysis Production of Biodiesel from Waste Cooking Oil," Egyptian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 65, no. 13, 2022.
[22]  H. Yang, R. Lu, and L. Wang, "Study of preparation and properties on solid superacid sulfated titania–silica nanomaterials," Materials Letters, vol. 57, no. 5-6, pp. 1190-1196, 2003.
[23]  N. Asikin-Mijan, G. AbdulKareem-Alsultan, S. M. Izham, and Y. Taufiq-Yap, "Biodiesel production via simultaneous esterification and transesterification of chicken fat oil by mesoporous sulfated Ce supported activated carbon," Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 141, p. 105714, 2020.
[24]  M. Helmi, K. Tahvildari, A. Hemmati, P. Aberoomand azar, and A. Safekordi, "Phosphomolybdic acid/graphene oxide as novel green catalyst using for biodiesel production from waste cooking oil via electrolysis method: Optimization using with response surface methodology (RSM)," Fuel, vol. 287, p. 119528. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119528.